Thus Doctors Frankenstein Do Run Amok in Their Laboratories - And the "Monsters" They May Create?

In 1931, a science-fiction film about a Dr. Frankensteinresearcher have already created a human embryo -
hit the theaters with the impact of a horror-thriller, aboth saying they destroyed it.
scientist building a somewhat larger-than-lifeThere seems to be a fair degree of "brain-washing"
"monster" from the bodies and brains of deceasedwith the conventional wisdom about
humans. Based on an 1818 nightmarish gothic tale,Darwin-Evolutionism being proven fact: intellectuals,
protruding bolt heads gave the man-creature acolumnists, reporters, Judges - essentially the
quasi-robot, mechanical (sci-fi-satisfactory)intellectual elite and lay folk of our society. However,
appearance. Somewhat similarly, and equallythe words of pro-Darwin scientists admit the
entertaining to seekers of horror- based thrills, the"mysteries" in their research - they cannot prove the
movie "Fly" dealt with a human-fly combination, theclaims of their advocates. There is also the litany of
scientist himself becoming the experimental subjectastronomical improbabilities to Darwin-Evolutionism by
when a fruit-fly accidentally enters hisscientists in every field (Reference Ezine articles: The
"matter-transformation" chamber.Pajaro Dunes Conference - Scientists Challenging
"Modern biologists aim to convince us that man is justDarwinism!; From Darwin - Evolutionism to Intelligent
another animal" says Eric Cohen, author of an article,Design - Inevitably!; Elitist World, "Brain-Washed" by
"The Human Difference", which appeared inDarwinism - Would Darwin Approve?;
Commentary magazine. Thus, if - as Darwinists argueDarwin-Evolutionism - Undeniable Astronomic
- man is but an accident of nature with no higherImprobabilities Despite Secular Claims of Proven Fact!)
authority for morality and ethics, no supreme beingThus, there is no basis for the assumed premise for
to thank or blame for his existence, then he surelysuch experiments - that there is no higher authority
has unfettered freedom for experimentations inre ethics or morality - thus man is free to conduct
bio-technology, such as man-animal combinations.whatever experiments with "life" that his curiosity (or
Although, perhaps below the radar screen of generalfinancial incentive) arouses. Although neither
public awareness, such experiments are presentlyDarwin-Evolutionism nor Intelligent Design can be truly
underway in China, Britain, the Caribbean and even atproved or disproved, by whatever rationality 21st
the Mayo clinic in the US - the ostensible forcingcentury science can muster, the probability odds
function being "holding out the promise of usefulfavor an "intelligent designer" by trillions to one.
results .. therapies for Parkinson's disease or forThere is, however, tremendous zeal with which
mass-producing designer stem cells."contemporary, Evolution-advocate scientists defend
That Americans enjoy such imaginative flights ofDarwinian theory, such as Richard Dawkins or Daniel
"scarification" is unquestionable. However, is there aDennett - "evolution is a kind of liberation, a proof
reality potential in today's medical technology andthat God is dead or there cannot be a God, proof
adventurism, a potential that is perhaps a bit morethat we are free to impose our own moral order on
scary - and realistic - than people may bea world governed only by amoral chance."
comfortable with?However, modern theorists like Demski, Behe and
Take some "for instances":Meyer then enter the fray with the weapons of
- Animal cloning was first achieved in 1996, inlogic, reformulating the watchmaker metaphor (the
Scotland, a sheep named Dolly - which subsequentlycomplexity of a watch is proof of a watchmaker),
died prematurely of lung disease.and in mathematical and biochemical terms, focusing
- Clonings of many animals have followed: a fewprimarily on the inadequacy of Darwinism for the
years ago a dog owner payed handsomely for aemergence of complex life. The foundation of
clone of her pet who had died.Darwinism is further weakened by the fact that
- In China and Britain, scientists are creating clonedthose who seem loudest in claiming factuality and
man-animal embryos using rabbit eggs and humanproven science for their belief seem to ignore the
DNA. In the Caribbean, human neural cells have beenmathematics and probabilities - and the arguments of
inserted into monkey brains. At the Mayo clinic,the hard science of physics, e.g. the Big Bang (from
researchers have produced pigs with hybridwhere did the enormous amount of energy come -
pig-human blood cells.that was transformed into all the "matter" comprising
- Octuplets were recently born in Los Angeles, fromour universe?).
the implantation of eight embryos in a woman. TheThe stem-cell debate appears to be the slippery
same doctor has implanted another woman withslope, what the political advocacy of full-out stem cell
seven.research will probably lead to. The Dr. Frankenstein
- Both an American doctor and a South Koreanmonster concept is becoming steadily more realizable.