The Pajaro Dunes "Conference" - Scientists Challenging Darwinism!

They were less than a dozen in total, all outstandingSparking great interest were well-known items from
scientists, serious doubters of the conventionaltoday's science, a thimble-full of cultured organic liquid
wisdom that Darwinism was proven fact. All highlycontaining billions of single-celled bacteria, each packed
credentialed, they were American and foreignwith complex circuits and microscopic molecular
nationals, having in common a dissatisfaction with the"machines". The common bacterium, propelled by its
accepted belief that the theory ofrapidly rotating whip-tail flagellum, was analyzed in
Darwin-Evolutionism completely explained the originsdetail. "Just like an outboard motor", commented Dr.
of life, and was established scientific fact. Yet that isBehe. Dr. H. Berg of Harvard had termed it "the most
what they had all been taught - and what they knewefficient motor in the universe." Dr. Scott Minich with
was still being taught - even in advanced biologytwo decades of study of the phenomenon, described
curricula. Michael Behe, world-renowned biologist fromit: ".. rotates at 100,000 rpm, stops in a quarter turn
Lehigh University, expressed his dismay (anger) atthen rotates in the opposite direction, while
having completed a doctoral program without havingconstantly receiving and processing inputs from the
ever been exposed to the solid arguments againstenvironment for obstacle avoidance." He explained
conventional Darwin theory that was presented in athat detailed examination of the microscopic
book by Michael Denton, " Darwin in Crisis". Dr. Deanmechanism disclosed component parts and functions
Kenyon, Professor Emeritus of Evolutionary Biologyanalogous to the optimized mechanical complexity of
from San Francisco State University was there, asa standard out-board-motor engine-propeller system.
were Drs. Paul Nelson, Stephen Meyer, WilliamAs an approach to their scientific evaluation of the
Demsky, Jonathon Wells, Jed McCosko and Scottwhipping tail, the concept of "irreducible complexity"
Minich - biologists, chemists, philosophers.was discussed. Using the common mousetrap as an
They discussed the ramifications of modernanalogy, it was very clear to all - five components: a
laboratory equipment such as the electron-micrographbait-holder; a capturing (or killing) mechanism; a
with 50,000-times magnification of living cells -hold-back device; a trigger device; and a platform to
unknown technology until recently, and the advancedwhich all elements are fastened in proper relationship.
knowledge in many related fields which raisedOf great significance to the scientists were three
substantive challenges to the century-and-a-half-oldspecific Darwinian factors, which should be applicable
Darwinism - all ignored by the popular media, courts,to living entities:
colleges and the public. Through their studies and
personal experimentation, these scientists had all1. until all elements of a system are present and
come to question the conventional belief system offunctional, the system will not operate;
Darwinism, and most certainly disagreed that it was2. until the system works, the non-functioning
proven science. In an unlimited atmosphere of freeelements are not a benefit but a hindrance to the
expression, they then exchanged ideas and concepts,entity's survivability; and
theoretically exploring the mystery of life - including all3. by Darwin 's own theory of natural selection, such
rational scientific options.non-beneficial appendages would be eliminated in
Later, many would describe the gathering as afollow-on generations.
defining moment in their technical lives.The complex marvel of function as shown in the
Charles Darwinmicroscope was broken down into the analogous and
They started with Charles Darwin, who in 1831, duringnumerous elements of a common motor-propulsion
a five year voyage of exploration, spent a month onsystem - forty parts, equivalent to rotor sections,
the isolated Galapagos islands, finding unique animals,drive shaft, stators, brakes, flexible joints, etc. (plus
plants and birds, differing from any seen elsewhere.an additional feed-back sensor). Each part of such
Among the latter he discovered thirteen species ofmechanical systems, with modern competitive
finches, with varying shapes and sizes of beaks,technology, is specifically engineered and designed for
which, twenty-five years later in his revolutionarymaximum overall operational efficiency - in stark
book "On the Origin of Species", became thecontrast to Darwin's theory of random-chance
center-piece of his theory. His theme was that timemutations, small, accidental steps, (somehow)
and random-chance-mutations had occasionallycontinuous generational improvement via
provided a natural advantage for obtainingadvantageous overall functioning. The visual evidence
seed-foods in various localities with differing plant lifeof the whipping-tail was obviously and completely
- which had, over time, resulted in the optimization ofincompatible with Darwin 's theory. To their rational
the various beak shapes relative to a particular localminds, the theory of small changes by happenstance,
food source. That was the significant conclusion fromwhich somehow fortuitously combine to achieve a
his observations - slight variations in beak shapewonderment of operational complexity and efficiency
during generations, initiated by random happenstancewas totally unacceptable by any scientific standard. It
mutations, but providing beneficial advantage in thewas not just a challenge to Darwin- Evolutionism
competitive struggle for existence by a functionaltheory - it was a shattering of it!
improvement, would gradually result in an optimizedInference to the Best Explanation,
beak-shape for a specific source of food. There wasThey were scientists, searching for understanding.
no need for "intelligent" guidance by a supreme beingWhile Darwin's theory was brilliant and clearly
- Darwin thenextrapolated his thesis beyond theapplicable at the sub-class level (for finch beak
finch's beak-shape optimization - to major variationsshapes - or skin-colorings for bears or humans -
of all basic life forms of animals, drastic physicaloptimizing the amount of Vitamin D absorption for
changes in appearance and function which improveddifferent locale sun-exposures, either deleterious or
chances for success in the competition for survival.beneficial), for the basic and initial origin of living
Darwin 's terminology: "natural selection via survival ofentities, however, the analogy to the outboard
the fittest."motor was inescapable. The end result, by logic, could
As the scholars and scientists reviewed Darwin 'sonly be achieved by end-objective "intelligence",
words, ".. cannot take a sudden leap, but mustdriving specific detailed "design-engineering" elements.
advance by short and sure, but slow steps", theyThe methodology of Science is specific with regard
noted what he had also said (and what histo acceptance of the "inference to the best
supporters never seem to acknowledge), "However,explanation". With Darwin's theory clearly inadequate
if it could be demonstrated that any complexand absent other feasible theories, the alternate
organism existed which could not possibly have beenconcept - first introduced by Behe in his book
formed by numerous successive slight modifications,"Darwin's Black Box" - was firmly selected by the
my theory would absolutely break down." (Emphasisgroup of scientists as the best possible explanation
added.)for the origin of life forms - "intelligent design"!
Bacterial Flagellum Motor,