How-Why Darwinism Errs - Evolution Time Not Billions of Years, But Six (24 Hr) Cosmic Days!

A tremendous misunderstanding seems to existwhat the Bible says, show complete agreement -
across a wide spectrum of society, not only by laydifferent words but no conflict. Events both in the
leaders of our culture: teachers, writers, judges,Cosmos and on Earth - as Astronomy and Earth
government officials, etc., but also amongsciences establish them - seem to concur with the
highly-educated scholars, generally those whose fieldsbiblical events. Correlation to Genesis, day by day is
of expertise exclude the hard science of physics -remarkable: the formation of galaxies; of our solar
many being unyielding atheists and strong advocatessystem, Sun, Earth and Moon; water; vegetation;
of Darwin-Evolutionism. Most of the above haveappearance of aquatic and flying creatures, mammals
heard and know about the "Big Bang" that createdand humankind - not a single non-conformity!
our Universe in a fireball of energy - that instantlyExtremely noteworthy is that the knowledge of
converted into a super-condensed particle of matterAstronomy and Earth sciences have been acquired
- which then expanded to become everything in theonly in the past few centuries, whereas, the
Universe; that it occurred 13.7 billion years ago; andmatching words of the Bible have been around for
that our Earth was formed 4 billion years ago. Notmillennia.
thought of probably, is that, during the interim tenThe time that seems available for
billion years, the "matter" which would eventuallyDarwin-Evolution-theorists to achieve the
become Earth was part of the swirling mass ofmutation-evolutionary effects of creating all living
still-expanding material, eventually and sequentiallyorganisms, appears to be nothing like billions of
becoming all galaxies, then our Milky Way, then ourEarth-years or even millions - before the Cambrian
solar system and finally our Earth. All this is the hardEra 530 million years ago (equivalent time), the
science of cosmology and physics, proven anddiscovery of 60,000 fossils from that period showing
acknowledged.all extant animals being fully-formed. Since the
What is wrong about those (casually referenced)time-relativity perception derives from the
billions of years, is that they have been taken at facedifferences in gravity-field-forces and travel speeds,
value - such eons of time used to rationalizeCosmic days - after the first six - continued, as 24
Darwin-Evolutionism theory - as if there truly hadhour days, as the equivalent Earth time continued to
been billions of years of Earth-time for "randomdiminish - until the factors of gravity and speed
mutations" and "natural selection" and "survival of themerged and became the same - the true,
fittest" to work their evolutionary magic. However,recent-past, Earth-time passage of time, just as we
they were not 13.7 billion Earth-years - they wereexperience it today.
actually only about six 24 hour days - on whatWhile extremes of gravity and velocity which existed
eventually became Earth! In the arcane world ofat the Big Bang, caused the million-million factor
Cosmic physics, of Einstein and his Law of Relativitydifferential of time-passage-rate, the reality of the
and Lorenze's time-dilation factors - the billions ofequations of relativity still apply - even in today's
years of time-passage are only "relative", aworld. Thus, for example, cross-country aircraft fliers
comparison of equivalency caused by astronomicalcompared to land-lubbers will age less, by about
differences in gravity fields and speeds of travelone-forty-billionth of a second ; while an astronaut
between what would eventually become Earth - atwalking on the moon (experiencing only one-fourth of
the beginning of Creation and our Earth of today.Earth's gravity), will age more, by a similarly
Cosmologists G. L. Schroeder ("Genesis and the Biginfinitesimal amount of time.
Bang" and "The Science of God") and N. Aviezer ("InHowever. Charles Darwin is certainly entitled to the
the Beginning") explain the phenomenon of "timecredit due his brilliant theories - acknowledged by the
relativity":scientists who, while challenging the application of
- "A million-million factor, as an average, is thethose theories to fundamental living organisms -
difference between our local perception - of Earthconcede they are clearly applicable, but only
time and cosmic time - it derives from thesubsequent to the initial living organism (somehow)
approximate million-million-fold stretching of lighthaving come into existence (e.g., changing the shape
waves as the universe expanded".of finch's beaks or the skin colors of bears and
- "From the Big Bang we know the temperature andhumans). For one thing, the challengers to Darwinism
hence the frequency of radiation energy in thepoint out that despite hundreds of thousands of
universe at quark confinement. It is not a valueanimal fossils discovered, none show an in-between
extrapolated or estimated from conditions in thestage of development. Also, while pro-Darwin
distant past or far out in space. It is measured rightscientists are openly atheistic, they do, however,
here on earth . . a temperature approximately aadmit to "mysteries" in their attempts to validate his
million-million times hotter than the 3 degree Kelvintheories. In contrast, the scientists and
blackness of space".mathematicians who challenge Darwin theory (at the
- "That radiation, from that moment of quarkbasic creature level) do so with calculations of
confinement has been stretched a million-million-fold ..astronomic improbabilities (Ref. Ezine articles).
that stretching has slowed the frequency of theTo answer the critics that a complex "watch" is
cosmic clock - expanding the perceived time by aproof of a "master watchmaker", and of the
million-million."astronomical complexity and improbability of random,
To put it differently and succinctly, as to the "eonsfortuitous "DNA-print-errors" of many pro-Darwin
of time" that Darwin-Evolutionists have been relyingarguments, there seems to have been a subtle
on - any organism that would have existed on whatmodification of the original Darwin theory of purely
would eventually become Earth - if such entity couldrandom mutations occurring from DNA copying-errors
have survived the immense temperatures, pressures,- into: "cumulative selection as a fundamentally
and gravity fields - to such organism, the "local" timenon-random process"; also "We have seen that living
experienced would not have been billions of years,things are too improbable and too beautiful to have
but only (24 hour) days. The million-million factorcome into existence by chance" (Richard Dawkins,
reduces the 13.7 billion years (equivalent Earth time -"The Blind Watchmaker", page 61; emphasis added).
in today's world) to only about six days "Cosmic"However, there still remains a die-hard insistence
time (of interest - but not to atheists - the Bible alsoagainst the concept of Intelligent Design, and thus
says six days).aggressive reliance upon eons of time: "thousands of
In Cosmic time, Day 1 would be equivalent to aboutmillions of years" (Dawkins, page XII). Thus, the
seven billion years (future-Earth-time); eachphilosophical arguments for Darwin-Evolutionism and
successive day would be about half the previous - asanti-creationism must eventually come up against the
the Universe expanded; Day six therefore, would behard, unyielding science of Einstein and laws of
about several hundred thousand Earth-years. Ofdilation. The Darwinists may ignore "time-dilation", and
great interest (additional bad news for atheists)want the world to ignore them also - but they
comparisons between what Cosmic and Earthremain as scientific truths.
sciences say occurred on each Cosmic day versus