| One of the greatest boons for Darwin's evolution | | | | earth life forms |
| theory was an experiment named the Miller/Urey | | | | 3. The chemicals used in the experiment would |
| experiment. This experiment used a number of | | | | eliminate the possibility of life ever forming. |
| chemicals, including ammonia and hydrogen. By | | | | This experiment has turned out to be a dead end for |
| putting electrical charges into these chemicals it | | | | people looking for the 'beginning of life' (according to |
| produced two very simple amino acids (these are | | | | the theory of evolution). |
| needed to build a protein molecule). | | | | And it gets worse. |
| This experimentation gave some hope that maybe | | | | Even evolutionists in general admit that the Miller |
| this was how life was formed. This experiment | | | | Urey experiment does nothing to bolster the |
| gained a great amount of attention because the | | | | evolution theory. But this experiment is still used by |
| experiment gave much validity to the thought that | | | | teachers, professors and textbooks as support for |
| this would lead to life from non-living (inorganic) | | | | evolution. |
| chemicals. | | | | So, even though this experiment has no validity (to |
| It wasn't long before this hope was dashed. There | | | | use in support for the theory of evolution), our |
| were some enormous problems: | | | | children are still being taught that it is a valid support |
| One of these was the fact that there was no | | | | for the theory. Textbooks throughout the US still use |
| oxygen used in the experiment. Oxygen is needed | | | | this experiment although it has been rejected by |
| for almost all life forms. But this oxygen would | | | | evolutionists decades ago as any evidence to help |
| completely destroy this experiment (it would cause | | | | evolution |
| an explosion). Oxygen, although needed for almost all | | | | That would mean that our young adults and even |
| forms of life, will eliminate the possibility of life also | | | | our children are being instructed with 'facts' that |
| during the 'formation of life'. I.e. the very ingredient | | | | completely contradict science (Unfortunately, there |
| needed for life is the very thing that eliminates life in | | | | are literally dozens of other examples like this are still |
| the beginning stages. | | | | in textbooks). |
| Other problems surfaced as well: | | | | Students today are learning Darwin's Evolution |
| 1. There is no scientific evidence that our | | | | Theory by ‘facts' that have been disproved |
| atmosphere was close to the same type of | | | | years ago. Has the time come to replace this type of |
| atmosphere that was used in the experiment has | | | | information in textbooks with the real scientific |
| never existed on earth. | | | | facts? Or is it right to allow our textbooks to |
| 2. If it ever did exist, it would be lethal to virtually all | | | | continue including outdated (and false) material? |