| For a century and a half, the most educated and | | | | this only obtains after the original life form has |
| intelligent of our culture (and I also) have accepted as | | | | somehow come into existence (at the sub-phyla |
| conventional wisdom, that Darwin-Evolutionism is | | | | level). |
| proven science: | | | | - Life in the laboratory has never been produced |
| - The intelligentsia: writers, teachers, Judges, etc., all | | | | despite decades of attempts: a "slime" is produced |
| dismiss the alternate theory, Intelligent Design, as | | | | by sparks (lightning) striking a (representative) |
| childish Creationism, merely an attempt to bring God | | | | pre-biotic pool of inanimate chemical "soup" - but no |
| and Religion into the classroom. | | | | "life", and no mutations. |
| - The title of a recent documentary film, "Expelled" | | | | - Scientists in many fields and mathematicians have |
| describes what happens today, to teachers who | | | | established astronomical improbabilities in a large |
| make such attempts. | | | | number of chemical and biological sequences, e.g. |
| - A century ago, Dr. Charles Walcott, Director of the | | | | amino acids, for the precise combination of factors |
| Smithsonian Institute, did the "unthinkable" for a | | | | necessary for life (per D-E theory, by pure random, |
| paleontologist - having discovered 60,000 fossils in | | | | fortuitous, sequential chance). |
| the Burgess Pass of the Canadian Rockies, the | | | | - It is pointed out - but ignored by D-E supporters - |
| greatest find ever, he re-hid them in Smithsonian | | | | that random chance mutations can work both ways, |
| basement lockers (re-discovered only recently). He | | | | they can undo an advantageous feature, as well as |
| did so because they showed fully-formed creatures | | | | improve it (random, means random). |
| of all extant life forms - not a single missing-link! Since | | | | - By simple common-sense logic, the "bird" should |
| they didn't support Darwin theory, Walcott worried | | | | show up the improbability of Darwin-Evolutionism; a |
| that they could destroy his reputation and career. | | | | bird flies and escapes its predators because it has: |
| - Even Albert Einstein succumbed to fear of the | | | | wings instead of heavy arms, feathers, twig feet, a |
| accepted mind-set, acting similarly in regard to his | | | | light body, simple beak to eat seeds and worms. By |
| Field Equations. They described an expanding universe | | | | common sense, each and every one of these |
| - which however, meant an ever contracting universe | | | | presumably mutated features - would have had to |
| in the past. Einstein's theory would therefore describe | | | | come about at precisely the same instant - not |
| the beginning of our universe as nothing but a tiny | | | | sequentially, since, by themselves, such features |
| speck -similar to biblical Genesis. Einstein, therefore, | | | | would be disadvantageous - a bird with heavy body |
| also did the "unthinkable", incorporating a "fudge | | | | or arms or legs, or a mammal with wings instead of |
| factor" so his mathematical universe would be | | | | arms, or a beak instead of mouth, could hardly |
| constant in size! After irrefutable astronomical proof | | | | survive. |
| of an expanding universe, he admitted his action as | | | | - Conclusion: Darwin-Evolutionism cannot be proved or |
| "the biggest blunder of my life." | | | | disproved, however, astronomical improbabilities are |
| Pro-Darwin-Evolutionism: Secular Elite and Scientists: | | | | against it - thus the only alternative is that there had |
| - Writers, teachers, Judges, etc, all believe D-E has | | | | to have been an Intelligent Designer, or Creator, for |
| been scientifically proven, and smugly dismiss | | | | each initial life-form entity (at the subsequent |
| alternate theory. | | | | creature level, D-E theory proves out just fine). |
| - Pro-Darwin scientists, strongly atheistic, however, | | | | - Even if D-E could be proven in the laboratory or by |
| honestly admit the "mysteries" they encounter in | | | | fossil evidence, a non-Creator theory also fails to |
| their research: "The origin of life ... appears to be | | | | explain the Big Bang, 13.7 billion years ago, when all |
| ...almost like a miracle ... but should not imply ... that it | | | | the "matter" comprising our entire universe: galaxies, |
| could not have started by a sequence of fairly | | | | suns, planets, moons, houses, cars, all fauna and flora |
| ordinary chemical reactions"; "Without amino acid | | | | life forms - came into existence in an instant - or to |
| tRNA ... no translation from RNA, but without DNA no | | | | use Einstein's Energy-Mass relationship equation, |
| synthesis ..."; "which came first, the chicken - form of | | | | "From where did the tremendous amount of Energy |
| DNA, or its egg - form of various proteins?"; etc. | | | | come, which was transformed into all the mass of |
| - Despite such obstacles, these scientists absolutely | | | | the Universe?" |
| refuse to concede the possibility of a God-creator, | | | | Seeking verification of Darwin-Evolutionism, for the |
| and continue to develop more and more complex | | | | past dozen years, all obtainable books and articles |
| theories, "The only alternative explanation of the | | | | across the spectrum of relevant science and |
| sudden appearance of so many complex animal types | | | | mathematics have been studied, those of dedicated |
| ... is divine creation, and we reject this alternative." | | | | atheists, pro-Darwinists, and those who strongly |
| - Conclusion: Pro-Darwin-Evolutionism scientists cannot | | | | challenge his theories. The conclusion is that neither |
| prove what their advocates claim (that D-E is | | | | Darwin-Evolutionism nor Intelligent Design can be |
| established scientific fact.) | | | | proven either way, but astronomical improbabilities |
| Scientists Challenging Darwin-Evolutionism: | | | | argue against Darwinism. However, there seems to |
| - Despite 150 years of search and hundreds of | | | | be a forcing function to the views of the secular elite |
| thousands of fossils not a single fossil has been found | | | | and pro-Darwin scientists - they just cannot seem to |
| with inter-step elements, to prove one creature type | | | | accept the mere concept of a Creator! The |
| evolved from another. | | | | conclusion therefore, seems to be - "Brainwashed* |
| - However, there is ample evidence that Darwin's | | | | and Miracles**" |
| theories of accidental mutations - causing feature | | | | * The Perceived Mind-Set of the Secular Elite re |
| changes - which, if favorable in the competition for | | | | Darwin Evolutionism! |
| life, do prove his "survival of the fittest" theory - and | | | | ** To Believe in Them - Have Faith - In Science and |
| are continued in the creature's progeny - however, | | | | Logic! |