1st Govt Rule, Protect Citizens - So, is Profiling Illegals Worse Than Letting Americans Be Killed?

Regarding the Arizona law recently passed aboutchallenged the AZ law, the ACLU will also undoubtedly
illegal immigrants, what if the conservatives indo so, and a federal judge will probably soon block it.
America proclaimed in all media outlets; "Dems preferThe issue, however, is one that demands the highest
occasional murders of AZ ranchers by illegals ratherof critical assessment. If the U.S. government takes
than police profiling brown-skinned citizens!" Theno action to protect its citizens, can the states do
reaction would be an immediate outcry disclaimingnothing?
any such preference - probably accompanied by legalThe outcry and objections center about police use of
suits for defamation. Yet the constant drum-beat of"profiling" - the classic case being police questioning
comment about the evils of profiling by the liberals inand harassing a "black" man in a running suit, late at
Congress and media - with not even a mention ofnight, in an exclusive "white" residential neighborhood.
the Arizona rancher killed by an illegal immigrant onlyThis has established criteria for behavior of
weeks before - or the lack of federal action togovernmental authority in all related situations, in
provide protection to Arizonans (its Mexican border issome cases where common sense would dictate
notorious for uncontrolled traffic in drug and alienthat such "political correctness" can become an
human smuggling and murders) - is that not the clearendangerment to society. Thus, for the past
inference to be drawn?half-century, 99.9 % of aircraft being blown up with
Oft-times life demands choices - sometimes betweentremendous loss of life, has been caused by young
desirable options (e.g. what should we spend ourIslamo-extremist terrorists - yet in US airports,
money on) - and sometimes undesirable choices. Thegovernment officials will subject octogenarians in
problem of "illegal" aliens in America has reached awheel-chairs to more scrutiny than is accorded a 25
critical stage, whereby the state of Arizona, withyear-old, bearded, fierce-looking Arab-appearing man.
almost 500,000 illegals overwhelming its schools andOther states may take actions similar to Arizona;
hospitals, with a rancher recently killed by an illegalfederal courts will probably block state actions. But
Mexican alien (with a crime docket) - has now takenwhat is the solution if the federal government, for
steps to defend its citizenry. The bill, clearly draftedpolitical considerations, takes no appropriate actions?
to emulate federal law, bans profiling, but authorizesCan the killing of a civilian rancher by an illegal alien be
its police to question suspected illegal immigrants, butjust shrugged off? One wonders - when "push
only if they are being stopped for some legal cause,comes to shove" (as in the case of the
an independent suspicion of law violation, such as in"water-boarding" of Al-Qaeda capturees, seeking
driving. However, the outcry from the liberal media asinformation to prevent future atrocities) - what
well as the federal government, primarily thewould the most liberal of viewpoints decide - if one
executive branch, was immediate and conclusive asof their own loved ones was at risk?
to being unconstitutional; "States cannot take overIn the "liberal" view of such "two-side" matters, is
what is clearly the responsibility of the federal"political correctness" ever over-ruled by "common
government!" The Attorney General has alreadysense"?