Is The Answer "Be Like Nike"

In the media crazy world in which we live, when NikeThe advertising was more effective simply because
presents a new tag line, or Mr.it was more memorable. Imbue
Potato Head rises from pop culture purgatory toan advertisement with human traits, and consumers
represent a modern version of theare more apt to remember it. It
Jolly Green Giant, advertising becomes big news. Inworked because we were able to tell a better
the dog-eat-dog world of faststory.Is USP the Answer?But is USP a cornerstone
food, the business community clamors to snatchfor stealing share? I think not. It is the antithesis of
small gems of marketing wisdom.How does this helpbrand
us steal share? Does it work? Has the gameobjectives. Purchases are not intellectual activities.
changed? Years ago,They ARE emotional ones. Few
brand was loosely defined as a "promise to theconsumers walk the market aisles armed with the
consumer of a perceived value."latest copy of Consumer Reports.
Corporations have spent billions of dollars buildingNo one picks the products or services they
brands, books have beenconsume as a result of a "T" chart, neatly
written, and articles have been published. Marketingplotted with the pros and cons of purchasing. And
experts told us that brand wasthis brings me back to the
the most important discipline in today's advertisingbeginning.This is why Nike is still news. Is the Nike
arena. Yet customers haveathletic shoe better than its branded
spent years telling us that brand was notcompetitors? Is it worth four times the cost of its
working.Traditional BrandingIf traditional brandinggeneric copycat? Does it make you
worked in the manner in which it was designed, yourun faster, jump higher, and land a multi-million dollar
wouldplace on a NBA roster? I
expect that there would be a sizable discrepancy inthink we can all say that it is none of the above.
price between generic andConsumers pay a market multiple
branded products. You would also expect to seeof FOUR to have the logo on their shoes. Nike is
robust margins in brandedconfident that they will do the same
products and a distinct consumer preference for thefor anything else they decide to brand.If you want
promise of value that the brandto steal share, your brand must recognize that every
delivers. However, what we see is great similarity inpurchase a
products, and hardly a nationalconsumer makes, no matter how small, holds within
brand exists that is not competing in the arena ofits nucleus the DNA of self-
price.Consider the history of the brand story. Itdescription. In this complicated and crowded world,
started as a means of product identity andwhere social and cultural
differentiation. It did not take a rocket scientist toidentifications have been dashed on the rocks, real
understand the basics. If thebrandface is recognizable and
consumer had a good experience with a product orindisputable. Show me myself, not as I am but as I
service, then he/she might lookwish to be and I will buy it every
for that same brand the next time he/she needed it.time. In fact, I will feel incomplete without it once I
Brand managers understoodknow it exists. In the face of a
the need for consistency of look and feel. It madecrowded marketplace, it pushes the competition
life easier and made sense ofunder.REAL brand BRANDS the customer, not the
choice.But the marketplace was not nearly soproduct. It actively tells the customer
crowded in those days. When David Ogilvywho they are when they use it. Does it work? Ask
helped make Hathaway a respected brand, itNike.Tom Dougherty
competed with a small group of otherCEO, Senior Strategist at Stealing Share, Inc. Tom
national brands, and an even smaller group of genericbegan his strategic marketing and
no-name shirtbranding career in Saudi Arabia working for the
manufacturers. Agencies at the time discovered thatinternationally acclaimed Saatchi &
if you created a brand imageSaatchi. His brand manager at the time referred to
for products, sales increased.The CrowdedTom as a "marketing genius,"
MarketEnter the creative revolution of the 60's - aand Tom demonstrated his talents to clients such as
time when advertising for inanimateAriel detergent, Pampers and
objects started with an infusion of human attributes.many other brands throughout the Middle East and
If the creative team thought ofNorthern Africa. After his time
the product in human terms (modern, forwardoverseas, Tom returned to the US where he
thinking, etc.), the advertisingworked for brand
seemed more effective.Soon the market becameagencies in New York, Philadelphia, and Washington,
more crowded as more messages and choices viedDC. He continued to prove
for thehimself as a unique and strategic brand builder for
consumer's mindset. Unique Selling Proposition (USP)global companies. Tom has led
was incorporated into theefforts for brands such as Procter & Gamble,
mix. Couple human attributes with the latest inKimberly Clark, Fairmont Hotels,
product benefit and branding, as weColdwell Banker, Homewood Suites (of Hilton),
now know it, was launched.Brand worked but notTetley Tea, Lexus, Sovereign Bank,
because of the human attributes called desired brandand McCormick to name a few.
image.