| Landing Gear on aircraft create one hell
| |
| | and cruise efficiency.How could this be
|
| of a lot of drag, which if you are trying
| |
| | done? Well it should be fairly easy. If
|
| to slow down to land can be a very good
| |
| | we use cradles to hold the UAVs this
|
| thing. But if you are trying to get to
| |
| | could work. You roll the UAVs onto the
|
| flying speed and climb or maintain take
| |
| | cradle and then put up the landing gear.
|
| off weight off a carrier, well it might
| |
| | The lead aircraft would take of with a
|
| be good to not have that drag hanging out
| |
| | 10% angle of attack, the second with 16%
|
| there. In fact if we could get rid of the
| |
| | and the rear UAV at 26%. This keeps them
|
| landing gear on take off then we maybe
| |
| | out of each others slipstream and wake
|
| able to launch several Large UAVs at
| |
| | turbulence. The larger carriers with side
|
| once. If we could launch three UAVs on
| |
| | catapult launch would do the same thing
|
| each of three catapults then we could
| |
| | 15 seconds later and then the other front
|
| send up set up delta formation swarms of
| |
| | catapult in 15 seconds after that. You
|
| three, threes of nine controlled by one.
| |
| | just launched 9 UAVs to handle the
|
| The sooner they make formation the faster
| |
| | net-centric battlespace grid in 30
|
| we could use the aerodynamics of those
| |
| | seconds. Once away, then you can flip
|
| tight formations to save fuel and
| |
| | unhook the cradles and get busy launching
|
| increase range. Additionally we would
| |
| | your commander chase plane with the
|
| receive another benefit of fuel due to
| |
| | pilots to handle the strike to meet them.
|
| the military power takeoffs, which could
| |
| | We can do this. Think on it.
|
| go literally immediately to best climb
| |
| |
|
