Explore the universe
 

Welcome to our rocketry Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Restoration in Russia: Much Needed and Inevitable

Translation of Russian political analyst narrow-minded anachronism.Russian
Alexey Pushkov's article of the same politicians still argue which party to
name.Handing over power to Vladimir Putin pattern our economy and policy on -
in 1999, Boris Yeltsin sought to preserve Europe or the USA. Oh, but we must
the political alignment of forces and pattern them on Russia, the total of its
coordinates he set during his rule in interests! Checking our interests with
Russia in 1991-1999. The project 'Heir' those of other counrties, of
did not only imply selecting a man from course.Sixth. Under Putin the country's
Yeltsin's 'camp', but the one who would controllability was restored, its slow
preserve the status quo of the regime. desintegration was stopped. When Yeltsin
This is indicated, among other things, by was in office the national republics fell
the fact that he insisted on his 'key off the Union, break-away sentiments
men' Alexey Voloshin and Mikhail Kasyanov appeared in the Chechen, Tartar and other
to have the longest possible term in autonomous republics, even certain
office.However, the overall results of Russian regions began to claim autonomy
Putin's five-year office show that he has (let us remember the Urals Republic
discarded most of Yeltsin's proposed by the Urals governor Eduard
heritage.First of all, he bridged the Rossel). This process was slow, but it
basic gap of Yeltsin's epoch, the gap endangered the country's integrity.
between the left and the right wings. Meanwhile Yeltsin took the 'gulp as much
Under Yeltsin, there was a continuous sovereignty as you can' stance.Zbignev
struggle between the authority, on the Bzhezinsky, a well-known American
one hand, and the communists, patriots political scientist, published a map
and socialist-oriented part of the where Russia was divided into three
population, on the other. The country was countries: European, Siberian and Far
fevered by constant strife; the State Eastern. That was his tentative project
Duma, where the communists had majority, for Russia. Yes, there was a possibility
being in the vanguard of struggle with of such an outcome - take the town of
Yeltsin and the elite, could not carry Khasavyurt in Dagestan, a part of Russia
out the legislative process, as their that was given 5 years' independence. The
laws did not suit the executive and were danger of disintegration is still
virtually directed against the looming, although the Center is keen on
latter.Putin neutralised the left, consolidating the country. Putin lifted
adopting much of their arguments: Russia the national morale and showed that
does have the acute demographic problem separatism will not go unpunished. He
(the low birth- and high death-rates), should beware, though, putting too much
the oligarchy dominance, corruption and pressure on the national republics and
weak army. These points were taken upon divesting them of their rights, as it may
by Putin in his election program, at cause an outburst of nationalism.Seventh.
least as a rhetoric (in the part of Despite all the drawbacks of the present
olgarchy limitations and army financing government, V. Putin was able to win back
they were put into actual practice). people's trust for public authority.
Then, Putin broke the Communists' There is no trace of 'devilry around the
'monopoly' on patriotism, thus rendering throne', so glaring in Yeltsin's time and
their traditional 'anti-people's regime' headed by Boris Berezovsky. Even the
rant meaningless.Communists are now heard liberal journalists, who criticise,
only when the authority initiates rash, sometimes unreservedly, the present
unprepared and ill-grounded laws, like government, admit that there was a
the monetisation of perquisites for mafia-like 'family clan' around Yeltsin,
pensioners - the measure, which was not which held power in the country. True,
enough elucidated in the press.Secondly, there are various factions and
the President was able to revamp the influential groups, promoting their
pattern of power and unite the elite. interests and struggling with each other
Putin assigned the issues of economy to in today's administration, but none of
liberal democrats, those of security - to these claim to have entire power, to be
the military and law enforcement, and the only decision-makers.Some people say
entrusted the administrators who V. Putin's team is not united. Yes, there
succeeded in retaining power in later are controversies in it. But, on the
Yeltsin's weakened hands with domestic other hand, there is no 'family' either.
policy. These are all very different St. Petersburg's representatives were at
people representing differents parts of first considered more 'close' to the
the elite, but to a certain extent united President than others, but it was not
under Putin.Why did the Union of the born out, say, Dmitry Kozak, was
Right Forces (the SPS) lose the recent dispatched to the Southern Federal
election? Because it was no longer District as the President's
indispensable: many government officers, plenipotentiary to deal with the Chechen
such as German Gref, Alexey Kudrin, Igor Republic and terrorism. Under V. Putin
Shuvalov pursue the rightist policy as it the 'office politics' (the code of
is. The perquisites monetisation, relations between officials) became
drafting the hyperliberal Forest Code, fundamentally different - meritocracy was
cancellation of State Standards for established.However, there are serious
pharmaceutical products and even problems ahead for Putin. He 'steered the
motioning prison privatisation are the ship about, but has not set a
telltale signs of the liberal course in well-defined course for her'.
Russia's domestic policy (whether these First. The economy grows largely due to
measures are for the good or for the bad the oil price rise. Russia hasn't begun
is another matter).V. Putin has in his forming a competitive economy -
arsenal not only the leftist, but also developing high technologies, launching
the rightist ideas. It is not accidental large-scale target programs, renovating
that Anatoly Chubais tried to throw in the defense establishments, etc. All
the catchphrase 'a liberal empire' to these could only be attained with the
define the present political system in participation of the state, but it left
Russia - the SPS was losing its 'property the economy to its devices. The positive
right' for liberal reforms. dynamics of Russia's economy won't keep,
Neutralisation of the right wing is the if the oil prices drop.The economy
third accomplishment of Putin's remains passive: it absorbs enormous sums
office.Fourth. Putin was able to of money and yields 6-7 percent growth,
considerably weaken the influence of big but Russia keeps selling its staple raw
business on the State machinery and materials and does not work up new
policy. Mikhail Khodorkovsky made an foreign markets. There is no growth in
attempt of directly converting money into mechanical engineering exports, nor in
power, like at a bureau de change - he high tech production. However, the
offered 15 billion roubles for power in competitive strength of an economy is
Russia. His plan was frustrated by Putin. determined by these two factors, and not
Some people say, it is not democratic. by raw materials, but by finished goods.
But did Khodorkovsky act in a democratic So far Russia's economy has not been set
way? How were the 15 billion rubles for efficiency, no innovative
obtained? In general terms, does big breakthrough has been made.Second. The
money entitle a person to power purchase? situation in Chechnya is much more
The history of Russian oligarchy is serious than it may seem, and the Chechen
essentially about converting money into leader Ahmad Kadyrov's assassination is a
power. Boris Berezovsky and Vladimir heavy blow to the peace in this region.
Gusinsky were doing it through mass Though there is no war in the classic
media, for example, when in 1996 Gusinsky sense there, as separatists have no power
helped Yeltsin win the elections to 'fight on fronts', Chechnya is
enlisting the services of the pervaded with separatist and terrorist
establishment-sponsored television agents. Raids and acts of terrorism still
channel NTV, it was the direct conversion obtain in the region, and even spread to
of a media resource into power.Earlier in the country at large.Third. Vladimir
1994 Alexander Korzhakov, the then Chief Putin has not yet created an efficient
of the President's Security Service, state machine. For example, the events in
conducted - by Yeltsin's instructions - Beslan on September 1-3 2004, when more
the 'mug in snow' operation against than 4,000 children and teachers were
Gusinsky, so that the oligarchs could held hostage, prove the low efficacy of
understand that authority should not be security service. Under B.Yeltsin the KGB
conflicted with, but paid off (not was being consistently wrecked under
necessarily with direct finance). So the pretence of fighting communism (the
oligarchs began to finance media to consequences of this act are not yet
brainwash people by meting out, fully overcome). Yet not one democratic
distorting information, misinforming, state could manage without strong
launching media attacks as a punishment security services, what was really needed
for public figures, orchestrating public is to reform the former Soviet
opinion, spin control and fixing intelligence.Fourth. Russia should
elections... For such services Berezovsky vindicate its positions in foreign policy
even obtained an office in the government with more firmness. American politicians
- he became deputy secretary of the spoke to me (Alexey Pushkov) about the
Security Council and was responsible for surprise Russia's refusal to back the war
the Chechen issues (a glaring absurdity in Iraq caused with the US
from today's perspective!).Berezovsky and administration. Why did Russia give an
Gusinsky believed that Yeltsin's apointee impression that it could be counted on in
Vladimir Putin would let them play their any matter, or that it shouldn't be
games as before. They were baulked in reckoned with? Because it had settled for
their plans. However, certain agressive anything the USA was doing, be it the
representatives of big business persisted withdrawal from the Anti-Missile Defence
in their struggle for power - the inertia Treaty (the Russian government's comment:
of complete license was too strong, the 'a deplorable error') or the second round
sense of omnipotence struck root. 'We of the NATO expansion. The US
would beat Yeltsin all the same - while administration overestimated its
he had been learning to play domino, we influence on Moscow, but it was Russia
had mastered chess', said Leonid Nevzlin, who gave cause for this, adopting a
a businessman and public relations policy too 'comfortable' for the
expert. Mikhail Khodorkovsky's logic was USA.Unfortunately, many features of
of the same strain: the sense of Yeltsin's administration devolved on that
exclusiveness prompted him to attempt to of Putin. The lack of publicity in
use financial clout and gain control over legislature is one of them. We are faced
the State Duma and the Federation with political reforms, which come as if
Council, thus becoming the 'power out of the blue - nobody has taken the
broker', de facto leader of the country. trouble to explain their essence and
That splendid coup was thwarted - Putin's prove their necessity. This is said to be
government wouldn't play either domino or the traditional Russian authoritarian
chess with Khodorkovsky, it simply style of administration. But bad
upturned the table. Some say it wasn't traditions should be changed, unless the
nice or fair. Perhaps. But it was not government is willing to stand aloof from
fair play on the part of Khodorkovsky in its people.The main dangers impending
the first place.Khodorkovsky's political over Putin's administration are as
failure as the failure of converting follows.The first is the situation in
money into power was logical. Yeltsin Chechnya. The efficiency of Putin's
depended on the oligarchs, as he had no policy largely depends on his ability to
other 'point of rest', being politically settle the Chechen conflict. If the
and physically infirm, unpopular, and 'vertical of power' built by him does not
undergoing persistent pressure from the yield fruit in that region, he will fail
left wing. Contrariwise, Putin is to convince the country in the necessity
popular; he succeeded in uniting the of exerting control. It is precisely the
elite and was able to move away from the issue of Chechnya that will be the
oligarchs.Some political scientists touchstone of Putin's policy, both in
maintain that the restriction of big Russia and internationally. The Chechen
business power is wrong, as it entails war and terror became Putin's gravest
the omnipotent power of State challenges, which demand the
bureaucracy. True, the official powers consolidation of power, strengthening of
should be counterbalanced, otherwise the the State, and in some cases, turning the
State becomes overpowering (this was screw. But if the screws are tight, and
Russia's permanent political bane, but the vehicle does not move, the question
the country needed it because of its of the adequacy of such a policy will
size, climate and a number of other arise.The second danger (more prominent
factors). But Yeltsin's immoral big during his second term in office) is the
business is not the kind of appearance of consolidated opposition. It
counterbalance the community needs. While includes the liberal politicians who lost
Russia was historically better off unter the election in the Duma, but have a
total power, the oligarchs would retain solid support of big business, their own
it, but make it inhuman and anti-national financial resources, and a substantial
- even more unscrupulous, mercenary and backing from abroad. They are eager to
corrupt. State totalitarianism would turn score political points using the
into oligarchal totalitarianism. There government's mistakes. For example,
was but imitation of democracy under against the logic of their liberal market
Yeltsin, but if Khodorkovsky could have views, they are attacking the
gained power, the political monetisation of perquisites for
pseudodemocracy might have turned into pensioners. They are doing it, because
oligarchal pseudodemocracy, with its the authority is vulnerable in this
arsenal of manupulative and venal media. poorely prepared reform. The next power
The restriction of oligarchal influence standing in opposition to Putin is the
on the policy and strategy of the State 'exiled' oligarchs. Berezovsky, Gusinsky,
is necessary. Giving a resolute check to Nevzlin are people with resources, and
Khodorkovsky's plans, Putin made him have connections in the West. Berezovsky
understand that individuals (even very is quite frank in saying that his
rich ones) cannot dictate the policy to principal goal is to weaken Putin's
the State.Fifth. Putin proclaimed the regime. Then, the government is opposed
foreign policy based on national by certain liberal media (which include
priorities. Under Yeltsin it was based on several central TV channels of Russia),
absolutely different principles: the especially their aggressive part backed
first postulate was that Russia should at by the oppositional big business. A part
all costs become the part of civilised of national and regional elite,
world, implying the West; the second was displeased at the decision that regional
that Russia has no national interests governors be appointed by the President
basically different from those of the (and apprehending the restoration of the
USA; the third was that Russia should unitarian state), may also join the
completely reject the use of force in opposition. A part of liberal
solving its political problems, as it is intelligentsia and the communists joining
'undemocratic'.Over the past 10 years we the liberals on certain points also swing
have seen other nations solve their against the administration. Finally, the
problems by various methods, including, anti-Russian and anti-Putin forces in the
alas, the use of force as, for instance, West are also opposed to Putin. All the
in Bosnia or in Iraq.We also realised, mentioned forces are, however, largely
that the course of equating Russia's outnumbered by Putin's supporters (in
political interests with those of US or Russia the ratio is about one to ten).
EU is not absolutely correct. Putin Nevertheless, they should be reckoned
agreed with the USA in the crucial issue with.Putin has few propagandists of his
of fighting terrorism, but he made it ideas and proposals. He himself has to
clear that our countries' views on some explain his home and foreign policy, the
other issues differ. He is not afraid to ideas of his political reforms. His press
say that Russia has inherent interests in secretaries and information services keep
the countries of the CIS (Commonwealth of silence, although it is their duty to
Independent States), even if it may annoy compete with the huge bulk of anti-Putin
some political parties abroad. However, propaganda. The system lacks people with
the practical realisation of Russia's active ideological and political
national interests may be impeded by two thinking, capable of supporting its plans
factors: the cosmopolitan character of and decisions. And this is in the face of
big business and the 'anational' strong opposition, nostalgic for
mentality of the younger generation of Yeltsin's Russia - weak, docile, corrupt,
Russians, formed during the past 10 and disintegrating.However, if the
years.'Paying taxes is our only duty, and efficiency of administration rises, the
we owe nobody but God and our economy grows, the opposition will have
conscience', Peter Aven, a business and to bear Putin's 'authoritarian
media tycoon, said in his interview. Yes, liberalism'. Conversely, if there are no
but if an individual knows neither God tangible results, he will be accused of
nor conscience? Why should big business sacrificing democracy. Putin must prove
detach itself from the rest of the that his model is efficient.The period of
nation? Russia's big business is authoritarian development is inevitable.
essentially cosmopolitan, not to say The liberals condemn Putin's policy as
anti-national.As for the 'anational' restoration, but restoration is a normal
mentality, it becomes apparent from the practice for any country after a sharp
fact that younger people, even those 'side slip'. If a nation loses capacity
whose major at universities is political for correcting its 'side slips', it may,
science, sometimes question the necessity like a car, roll over at a sharp turn of
of Russia's 'special attutude' towards history. Restoration is the nation's
certain issues. 'Why don't we just trim adaptation to new conditions, its
ourselves to the US position?', they ask. self-regulation, aligning a car after a
The notion of 'national interests', as drastic side slip.
well as patriotism, has been decried as




www.rocketrynews.com keyword stats [2007-08-24-2007-08-24]



Other search engines trends:



Other search phrases:

model ship plans indoor rc airplane
plano model products model airplane hobby
remote control airplane advanced rc helicopters manufacturing
fur will fly rocket video
remote control airplanes so fly
great planes model distributors model aircrafts
how to build model rockets die cast model cars
flying machine super kraft airplanes rc
radio controlled model chu chu
Houston rockets dance team joe rocket jackets
make model airplanes model train track plans
lepton rc heli 1 18 model
flying j





1- A- B- C- D- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48-