ISO9000 & Beyond

To be successful, organisations must proveBSC is applicable to any type of organisation, albeit
themselves to be indispensable to their customers,with modifications. For example, a BSC for non-profit
be attuned to their employees' needs, be willing toorganisations must be modified to include a mission
partner with their suppliers, and be considerate of theperspective and any other additional perspectives
social, environmental, and safety outcomes of theirwhich provide specific information on social
performance. These rather new and expandeddemographic factors regarding the organisation's
objectives of business operations, are the main pillarsenvironment. Viewed as a performance measurement
of business excellence.system (PMS), the BSC is not a new tool as PMSs
Samson and Challis (2002) studied leading internationalhave existed for a long time in all organisations and in
organisations in an effort to determine why somemost cultures, in one form or another. Hence the
were more successful than others in their pursuit ofnovelty of the BSC does not reside in its existence
excellence. They identified a total of 14 principles thatbut rather in the attempt to achieve standardisation
served as catalysts for business excellence. Thevia conventions and universal rules (Urrutia de Hoyos,
extent to which each organisation embodied these2001).
principles appeared to be directly related to theThe BSC's most standardised antecedent is the
speed of its journey towards excellence."tableau de bord" (Mallo and Merlo, 1995), a tool
Furthermore, the EFQM Excellence Model, which isutilised principally by French companies, and whose
used to adjudicate the European Quality Award, andconfiguration and conceptual basis is very similar to
the most frequently discussed model in qualitythe BSC. One explanation for the lack of
literature (van der Wiele et aI., 1995, 2001), usesstandardisation of PMSs along the line of the tableau
self-assessment as a tool to identify organisationalde bord and BSC is certainly the lack of publicised
strengths, as well as areas in which there existsinformation regarding their existence due to its being
room for improvement. Its outcome is a structuredan excessively strategic tool; due to their strategic
plan for amelioration, which is subsequently monitorednature, organisations are very reluctant to disclose
for progress. In addition to this self-assessmenttheir existence and utilisation.
component, the EFQM assists organisations with theirDevelopment of the BSC
continuous improvement initiatives by facilitatingThe development of the BSC has gone through
gauging of progress against measures of total qualitythree distinct phases.
management, identification of improvementThe First phase
opportunities benchmarking and organisational learningInitially the BSC was intended as a measurement tool,
(McAdam and Kelly, 2002).with an operational and tactical focus. It was a
Truly effective use of the excellence models forcollection of indicators arranged by perspectives or
continuous improvement requires the input ofkey areas, which permitted the identification of the
management and employees. For maximum benefit, itdeterminants of the performance of a business. The
must be effectively marketed by top managementoriginal objective was to overcome the limitations of
and internalised by the staff of the organisation (vanusing only financial indicators. These last only provided
der Wiele et aI., 2000). Also, to be optimallyinformation about actual, past performance, and failed
effective, quality improvements should be prioritisedto provide information on the drivers of future
and should focus on the results category of aperformance (Kaplan and Norton, 1996). The four
business excellence model such as the EFQMBSC perspectives - financial, customer, internal
Excellence Model (EFQM, 1999; Seghezzi, 2001), theprocesses, learning and growth - were selected on
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA,the basis of the results of a study by David Norton
2002), or the Canadian Framework for Businessand Harvard University (Kaplan and Norton, 1992).
Excellence (CFBE, 2002).The Second phase
Quality managementIn the process of identifying indicators for each of
The family of ISO 9000 standards can be regardedthe four perspectives, it was discovered that by
as the foundation on which organisations can builddeveloping strategy maps, not only could the
their excellence programs. The success of a qualityappropriate indicators be identified, but also
management program that builds upon the foundationmanagement could utilise the BSC for strategic
of the ISO 9000 system has been said to relate toplanning. In the first phase, indicators were identified
the original motivation for registration (van der Wielesubsequent to the development and definition of the
et aI., 2001). The message is that the added valueorganisation's strategy, and had an operational and/or
that an organisation derives from the ISO 9000tactical focus. During this phase, it was discovered
standards should be a result of that organisation'sthat it was not enough to simply identify indicators, it
motives for, and approach to, implementation (Cobb,was also necessary that the indicators were
2003; Gotzamani and Tsiotras, 2002; Singels et aI.,extracted directly from the strategic plan. This so as
2001). Issues such as organisation, internal andto identify, and explicitly describe, the causal
external communications, employee awareness ofrelationships with the organisation's strategy. In other
quality, product conformance and customerwords, the indicators were identified prior to the
satisfaction are all addressed within the ISO 9000development and definition of the organisation's
system, simplifying management commitment tostrategy, and as such playa key role in the
quality. This can be a driving force to go beyond anddevelopment and definition of the strategy. The act
achieve business excellence. However, if not doneof measurement has consequences that exceed
properly, it is also possible that implementation of ISOsimply providing information on past results. It also
9000 may lead to excessive emphasis on thedirects attention to the future, since the indicators
documented procedures and less emphasis onselected by management are 'de facto' those which
achieving business objectives (Gotzamani andare important to management. Hence, with a clearly
Tsiotras, 2002).defined strategy, coherently communicated and
The importance and relevance of quality cannot bealigned with change drivers, what was initially an
overstated. In recent decades, public, private, andinformation/measurement tool, and part of the
third-sector organisations have been awakened tomanagement control function, was converted into a
the necessity of creating and ensuring quality intool for strategic management (Kaplan and Norton,
every aspect of their operations. Far beyond2000) and a part of the strategy formation process.
"permitting things to run smoothly", an emphasis onThe Third phase
quality in management systems is now consideredThe BSC communicates the organisation's strategic
essential to an organisation's prosperity. Globalisationplan via maps in which the cause-effect relationships
and an enhanced concept of corporate liability arebetween the different strategic objectives can be
two important societal trends contributing to thisvisualised. This permits management to utilise the BSC
emphasis on quality. There are numerous reports inas a tool for change management leading to the
the literature that describe quality managementachievement of Business Excellence.
practices and the benefits that emanate fromConclusion
implementation of an ISO 9000 system. Many ofThis article explored the broad issues related to
these are case studies or reports of the benefits andbusiness excellence and the application of ISo 9000
drawbacks of such systems. The emphasis is onand the BSC as the first steps in achieving excellence.
continuous improvement which is beyond simpleISO 9000 and the BSC aim at assisting firms to
conformance to the ISO 9000 standards.develop systems and procedures which allow them
The Balanced Scorecardto achieve business excellence by becoming more
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is an instrument whichcustomer-oriented. The implementation of such
translates the mission and strategy of an organisationsystems requires on-going support from senior
into a broad collection of action metrics andmanagement; taking into consideration the role of
indicators, and which subsequently provides theinternal reporting and operational control systems to
structure necessary to serve as control and strategicmonitor and proactively adapt to changing business
measurement system (Kaplan and Norton, 1996). Theneeds.